|
THE WORLD SINCE 1492 |
||||
|
The
Manor of Late Christendom |
Plantations of the Americas |
|||
|
|
|
|
||
|
(i) The
work site (or site of production) is also a household (or domestic unit). |
(i) The
site of production (or work site) is also a domestic site. |
(i) The
site of production and household are physically separate. |
||
|
(ii) The
male head of household is the master. Laborers are family members and family
members are laborers--economic and kin ties are not separate. Relations
between masters and servants can be violent, but they are not economic, for
there are reciprocal (if hierarchical and asymmetrical) ties. For example,
peasants produce subsistence goods, while local lords of the manor provide
security from raids as well as justice in the case of disputes. On the manor,
there is not an economic rationality (of profit-maximization) behind
decisions about employment: the master cannot layoff a family member when
profits are down. |
(ii) The
owner may be absent (typical for the Caribbean) or in residence
(typical for the southern U.S.). Generally, an overseer and assistants
violently enforce work discipline; most work is done by slaves. Slaves
live in separate "barracks" near the 'great house," and the
residential buildings are surrounded by the work fields. There are no
reciprocal ties between masters and slaves. The laborer (the enslaved human
being) is commodity: decisions about him/her are characteristically made on
an economic basis. (For example: which is cheaper, to provide extra food for
low-productivity, pregnant women, and thereby low births, or to pay for the importation
of new slaves?) By early 1700s, positions in system of production are
raced--which is to say "class," as a |
(ii) The
owner may or may not be the manager and/or the foreman. Neither managers nor
owners have a social or familial tie to workers. Labor time is a commodity:
it is sold by the worker and bought by the company. Decisions about use of
labor time are made on an economic basis. |
||
|
(iii) On
the manor, there is not an economic rationality behind decisions about 'what
to produce?' What must be produced is determined largely by the
subsistence needs of households and the manor as a whole. Because it is
basically a subsistence unit, the manor must produce a great variety of
things. |
(iii) The
plantation produces commodities for the metropole. It is rarely
self-sustaining. It generally produces a single, luxury crop (this is called
monocrop agriculture). Examples of plantation products include sugar, tobacco
and cotton. Life-sustaining (or subsistence) crops are produced only when
costs of imported food and slaves are high. |
(iii) The
factory produces commodities, for domestic and foreign markets. It is not a
self-sustaining unit. |
||
|
(iv)
Exchanges within the manor are in kind, rather than in money. There is no
wage. Taxes too are in-kind, so the lords do not accumulate wealth in a form
that allows for much involvement in long distance trade. |
(iv) The
most important exchanges in the plantation system are for money: money is
paid for the enslaved humans (though not to them), and money is paid for the
products they make. On the plantation, we find a careful accounting of costs
and benefits. (Note that there can be no such accounting without a common
quantitative measure of all goods and services, that is without money. |
(iv) Almost
all transactions are for money. |
||