Back |
D.G.S. MTIMKULU |
A. H. Ngidi is not as well known in our intellectual and
cultural history as he deserves to be because a large portion of his work
seems to have been lost. One literary portrait of this fascinating man
was pened by H. I. E. Dhlomo in the form of an obituary: "The death of
Dr. A. H. Ngidi has removed from amongst us one of our greatest sons. To
become a Catholic priest is no easy work. It requires a discipline, character,
concentration and devotion beyond the common type. Dr Ngidi went further
than this, He proceeded to Rome and proved---in the early days when Africans
had very little opportunity to prove---that the African had intellectual
powers equal to anyone. He received doctorates in the humanities, the classics,
theology and philosophy. . . . The outside world knows him as a scholar,
a creative artist, a social worker and a patriot. . . . Most of his time
and energies were devoted to his professional work. In spite of this he
managed to compose music, write a great body of Zulu poetry, and serve
in organisations that worked for the social upliftment of his people. .
. . His contributions as a creative artist are outstanding. scholars such
as as the late Dr, Vilakazi owe much to his teaching example and inspiration.
Father Ngidi's poems are some of the most 'fluid' in the Zulu language.
That is, there is no sign of effort about them. They seem to have come
from him as naturally as breathing. And the remarkable thing is that most
of them were in rhyme which is considered 'foreign' to Bantu poetry or,
at least, a stumbling block. The form was invariably classical owing to
his great intimacy with classical scholars and literature. He was a master
of Greek and Latin" ("Dr. Ngidi", Ilanga lase Natal, August 18,
1951). Indeed, Benedict Wallet Vilakazi had already affirmed the influence
of Ngidi on him, in an essay of 1933 delineating his intellectual formation:
"During my study i got very much interested in the writings of one 'Amicus
Homini Gentis' who as late as 1930 gave us his well selected notes that
gave much variation among the writings of men like Rev. Dr. A. H. Ngidi
who wrote very scientifically. Fr. Ngidi's scientific writings in 1924
led to a big quarrel with the late Rev. Nyokana and I remember very well
how, on Fridays when work was over, we rushed to read our evening mail
and to see the two great minds exchanging blows in the literary theatre"
("What Writers Has This National Paper", Ilanga lase Natal, March
17, 1933). It would be difficult to overestimate the importance of A. H.
Ngidi to Vilakazi's intellectual formation. In his first writing to appear
in Ilanga lase Natal, which was a synthesis of the history of the
relationship between Christian civilization (from his view Catholicism)
and political philosophy, Vilakazi endorsed, without naming names, the
perspective of New African intellectuals such as Josiah Mapumulo and A.
H. Ngidi, among others, for whom Christian civilization was an essential
and vital component in the making of African modernities: "In absence of
deep religious feelings and practices most of the time has been spent in
plottings and dissensions with gain to nobody. We do hope that the rise
of men who, gifted to lead, masintaining the common touch, and reckless
of self, will go forth to battle with the hydra-headed prodigy that threatens
'again and again' this vaunted Christian civilisation to its doom. It is
difficult and impossible to follow the vagaries of the carping critics.
The fact that nations calling themselves gone far to create the problem
and to exasperate the whole situation is due not to the Christianity that
they profess, but to their manifest failure to apply their Christianity,
or even to begin to understand its bearing upon the problem" ("Etiam Atque
Etiam: Old Is New"), September 27, 1929. Despite the enormity of Ngidi's
presence in the imagination of Vilakazi, the proof that the fear that Dhlomo
had expressed in this obituary, that the great poetic work of Ngidi would
be lost if not assembled together for publication had come to pass, is
indicated by Ngidi's absence in the list of stellar modern Zulu poets analysed
by Mazisi Kunene in his great M. A. thesis: An Analytical Survey Of
Zulu Poetry: Both Traditional And Modern (University of Natal, 1959).
He analyzes the work of Benedict Vilakazi, E. A. H. Made, Thomas Mthembu,
Elliott Mkhize, among others, but Ngidi is conspicuous by his absence.
In this brilliant study, Mazisi Kunene articulated the view that Benedict
Wallet Vilakazi was the first great modern Zulu poet. Affirming this view
a decade later, Kunene wrote: "As the Zulu literary tradition had been
devalued, I started writing without models, until I discovered Vilakazi's
poetry. When I became dissatisfied with Vilakazi and others, I started
my own metrical experiments based on the recurrence of stress in the penultimate
syllable" ("Introduction", Zulu Poems, Africana Publishing Corporation,
New York, 1970). Another decade later, in poem, Mazisi Kunene had this
to say of Vilakazi: "Sleep tried to split us apart/ But the great dream
created a new sun./ Through its towering rays two worlds emerged/ And our
twin planets opened to each other./ I saw you descending from a dazzling
hill,/ Your presence filled the whole world. . . ." ("A Meeting with Vilakazi,
the Great Zulu Poet", The Ancestors & the Sacred Mountain: Poems,
Heinemann, London, 1982). This is a view no doubt H. I. E. Dhlomo would
have found not historical enough in its reticence about A. H. Ngidi, especially
its certainty that Vilakazi was the beginning point of modernism in Zulu
poetry. In all likelihood, Dhlomo would have preferred a much more nuanced
periodization that marked Zulu modernism in poetry with the sign post of
A. H. Ngidi. Without wishing to distort the balance between the poetic
and philosophical in Ngidi's oeuvre, so far we have perhaps over-emphasised
the former at nearly the expense of the latter, in the years he contributed
regularly to Ilanga lase Natal, between December 16, 1921 and November
10, 1922, the political and the prose forms predominated. In an important
philosophical perspective, Ngidi sought to synthesize Christianity, nationalism
and history as an ideology of African modernity: "We study the history
of past ages in order to learn for our present times and for the future.
As an Aboriginal Native European University Student, and knowing well what
I am saying, I do not hesitate to strongly aver, that I love my mother
country, South Africa, and my Native fellow-countrymen from the innermost
of my heart. Our present position demands 'unity' in all possible directions
and respects. Oneness of aim and purpose should be our supreme ideal. The
question that is staring us in the face, is how to achieve this oneness
of all of us Natives. On what possible basis can we place ourselves? The
most natural basis would be religion; and this we have learnt from the
most unmistakable and unimpeachable facts of history. . . . really educated
Nastive men will calmly hear my quiet considerations and reply objectively
to the point at issue and not give passion and wild feelings. I have come
to the conviction that unfortunately religion can hardly under the present
circumstances form the basis for our national unity. In such an important
matter we can but be united on sound principles. Not being able to
achieve a stronger principle, we must contend with what we can get. And
our next best basis for unity is to be sought in the most sublime of human
things. Having, therefore, in vain sought for shelter in religion in our
utter distress and dismal helplessness, let us take refuge in the love
of our mother-country, and see how we could find a workable bond of unity,
that will bind us together and make us feel as one body, soul and mind.
History comes again to our rescue with this wholesome lesson. Modern and
current history seems to afford us more courage and stimulus in this our
last hazardous endeavour. So, my African fellowmen, let us all call out,
in one supreme effort: 'Africa est patria mez'" ("Why Do We Study History",
Ilanga lase Natal, November 10, 1922). Such views must have been
intoxicating on a sixteen year old Benedict Wallet Vilakazi. The true intellectual
dimensions of A. H. M. Ngidi are still not visible to us half a century
after his death.
|