Back |
JACOB M NHLAPO |
Perhaps there is no better way of appraising Jacob Mfaniselwa
Nhlapo than by quoting his first serious essays which were a declaration
of his entrance into, and subscription to, the New African Movement. That
they appeared in Umteteli wa Bantu in the 1920s was not accidental,
because it was in this decade on the pages of this great newspaper that
the New African intelligentsia established the intellectual tradition
of New African modernity. His first appearance on the pages of the newspaper
coincided with that of H. I. E. Dhlomo (made his debut on October 18,
1924 with the article "Hardship and Progress"). Like his elder colleague
(only by a year), Nhlapo entered this intellectual tradition by emphasizing
the discursive system of the dialectic between modernity and tradition
which was exercising the historical imagination of the New Africans: "Much
is being said and written today about the disintegrating forces which
are at work among the Bantu as a consequence of the advent of Western
civilization. The loss of some of the good Bantu customs is being justifiably
delpored and the resentment by the black man of the white man's ways is
receiving daily expression. But the present state of affairs amongst our
people demands more from our Native leaders than a mere recital of the
fact that the Western civilization is the fount of the whole trouble.
There are two enemies rampant among the Bantu today: there is the religious
indifference and there is also drunkenness which has given genesis to
the present low moral standards of our people. I am firmly convinced that
if these two evils are eradicated the Bantu future will be brighter. Though
many other Native races have died out as a result of coming into contact
with the Western civilization the Bantu have not shared their fate" ("The
Bantu Future", September 3, 1927). Coming from a young man of twenty-three,
these words, surely, must have been pleasing to his senior colleagues
in the newspaper: Allan Kirkland Soga, R. V. Selope Thema, H. Selby Msimang
and others. A year earlier, in a Letter to the Editor, Nhlapo had noted
that modernity had made the lives of Africans and Europeans inseparable
from each other: "The attitude of the whiteman towards the Native is,
to my mind, partially if not entirely, responsible for the difficulty
and perhaps for the very existence of this problem for he will not give
the Native any chance to rise, he will not give him the rights which he
has by no means proved incapable of using wisely. . . . Further the Native
demands that his colour should not be made a qualification for his exclusion
from those privileges to which as a human being he is entitled. . . .
The lives of the European and the Native have become so intertwined that
in the endeavour to solve a problem which so greatly affects both races
any other device than that of co-operation and mutual consultation is
doomed to failure" ("Solution of the Native Problem", Umteteli wa Bantu,
October 9, 1926). Upon his entrance into the New African Movement, Nhlapo,
over many decades, was to display his multivalent talents. In an obituary
appearing in the form of the Masterpiece in Broze series in Drum
magazine, paid tribute to his intellectual endowments: "That grand
old anachronism, Doctor Mfaniselwa Nhlapo, is no more. To understand him
fully, one must see him by what he was not, every bit as much as by what
he was. . . . Bachelor of Arts, Doctor of Jurisprudence, Doctor of Philosophy,
Diplomatist in University Education and Bantu Studies, church leader,
philologist, linguist, orthographer, journalist, Jacob Nhlapo was quite
a phenomenon. But still an anachronism" ("Dr. Degrees!", by D. C. T.,
July 1957). In parenthesis: Jacob Nhlapo obtained his doctorate in the
early 1940s from a controversial private/family institution based in Chicago,
the McKinley University, for the dissertation: Intelligence Tests
and the Educability of the South African Bantu. Although an intellectual
of many talents, Nhlapo is renowned in South African intellectual history
for his 1944 pamphlet, Bantu Babel: Will The Bantu Language Live?,
in which he argued that all the major African languages in South Africa
should be systematically combined into a SINGLE LANGUAGE. This proposal
and thesis has fascinated many of our leading African intellectuals: from
such a New African intellectual like H. I. E. Dhlomo in the 1940s to a
post-New African intellectual like Neville Alexander in the early 1990s,
on the eve of the historic date of 1994. In his excited response within
a few weeks of the publication of Nhlapo's formulation Dhlomo wrote: "He
deals with the delicate subject of Bantu languages. His plea is that Xhosa
and Zulu (and the intermediate dialects such as Swazi, Ndebele, etc) made
into one language. People who speak or write Xhosaised Zulu and Zuluised
Xhosa, Nhlapo contends, should be encouraged, not condemned for they are
the forunners of this unity. What he pleads for in the Nguni Group of
dialects, he urges for the Sesotho Group also. He suggests that before
this is accomplished, English should be---in fact is---the African Esperanto.
I wonder what our purists, European experts and linguists, let alone the
racialists, will say!" ("The Sixpenny (Bookman) Library", Ilanga lase
Natal, March 18, 1944). Since Dhlomo was seriously engaged with the
role of African languages in facilitating the making of African modernities,
he returned again to the ideas of Nhlapo in another context ("Language,
Literature, Liberation", Ilanga lase Natal, September 29, 1951).
When Jacob Nhlapo re-articulated his proposition in a short brilliant
essay ("The Problem of Many Tongues", Liberation, no. 4, August
1953), it elicited a remarkable response, which was paradoxically a deep
appreciation and withering criticism, from Peter N. Raboroko ("The Linguistic
Revolution", Liberation, no. 5, September 1953), which must stand
as one the great essays of the 1950s. When Neville Alexander in the early
1990s proposed that Jacob Nhlapo thesis concerning African languages (The
Sociology of Language with Special Reference to Language Planning for
a Democratic South Africa, 1990, pp. 26; Language Planning in South
Africa: with Special Reference to the Harmonisation of the Varities of
Nguni and Sotho, 1991, pp. 44) should be embraced as a state policy
by the post-apartheid government of Mandela, one is certain that he was
unfamiliar with the political history of Nhlapo's proposal, especially
its encounter with the intellectual power of Raboroko's historical imagination.
This is not said in belittlement of Jacob Nhlapo's contribution to the
making of African modernity, especially as Principal of Wilberforce Institute,
a High School founded by Charlotte Manye Maxeke, and whose lasting effect
has been incalculable.
|