THE WORLD SINCE 1492

                   ASSIGNED DOCUMENTS 

Marx, Karl. Excerpt from Capital, Vol. I. (1867). 

Born in 1818 to a middle-class family in the western area of the German Confederation, Marx studied law, philosophy and history at the universities of Bonn and Berlin. At first the young Marx hoped to secure a professorship, but he abandoned this idea in the 1840s. Instead, he began writing articles for newspapers of the political opposition in both Germany and France. During this early period he developed a materialist analysis of history that stressed the importance of systems of economic production in determining the shape of societies. In 1848 when revolutions swept across Europe, Marx and his lifelong collaborator Friedrich Engels published the Communist Manifesto. After the failure of those revolutions, Marx and Engels continued to develop a revolutionary economic and social analysis of capitalist societies, particularly their own capitalist societies.  Both Marx and Engels also played leading roles in founding international socialist organizations of workers. In Capital, Marx set out to analyze in depth the principles and effects of capitalist economic relations.  For the PDF of this reading click here.Click here for the selected, short excerpts from Capital.

 

Peck, Raoul, dir. The Young Karl Marx (2017; 118 minutes).  Born in 1953 in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, Raoul Peck served as Haiti’s Minister of Culture from 1996-97 and, in recent years, has emerged as a singularly creative and impactful filmmaker.  Before making this historical feature film released in 2017, Peck directed the documentary “I Am Not Your Negro” focused on James Baldwin. The film can be found on Sakai for this course, but is much better seen on a big screen with suitable projection and sound: if at all possible, attend the screening in Benson Auditorium on Monday, March 21, starting at 7:30 pm.  Though I probably will not be there when the film starts at 7:30, I will be present at the end of the film, to hear your questions and/or first impressions of the film, before our weekly workshop discussion.  If you choose to watch it from Sakai and have any trouble with that, please email Victor Milhon-Martin of Pitzer AV.

 

QUESTIONS

 

As always, expect to prepare multiple drafts of each question and to revise them with the care and thoroughness your ideas deserve.  Some of these questions can be answered with short responses, but please use complete sentences.

 

Question 1

 

a. & b. Provide a concise definition or glossary entry for “use-value” and “exchange value,” as Marx uses these terms in this reading.  As always, be sure to speak directly to this prompt, something like this: “By ‘use-value,’ Marx means…”  And, again as always, incorporate aptly chosen quotations to support your answer.  Finally review and be prepared to revise your answer in light of your responses to the rest of this study guide.

 

c. Marx divides the full range of “human needs” into two broad categories: “needs of the stomach” and “needs of the imagination.”  Explain the distinction Marx is drawing here, in regard to “human needs.”  And note: Marx is speaking figuratively, not literally, when he writes about “needs of the stomach.”

 

d. On the first page of the assigned chapter, Marx writes, “Every useful thing is a whole composed of many properties; it can therefore be useful in various ways.” Illustrate this claim by discussing the “various” (or  plural) ways something you possess is “useful” for you (or, in Marx’s terms, can be said to have plural use-values).  It would be great (bonus points!) if your example involves use-values that meet both sorts of “human needs” Marx delineates.   

 

e. Are all things with use-values (or all “useful things”) commodities, according to Marx?  Explain and give an example that illustrates your answer.

 

Question 2

 

Marx presents and discusses a number of ways the exchange-value of a given commodity can be expressed.  One of these ways of representing exchange-value is what Marx calls “the money-form” (157).   Here are some exchange-values given in “the money-form,” in which all of the listed items on the left (each item being a definite quantity of some commodity) has the same (made up) money-value of $1000.

 

1 pair of Christian Louboutin shoes     =          $1000

1/25th of a Civic Hybrid automobile     =          $1000                              

40 bottles of Grey Goose Vodka          =          $1000        

1/5th of one dose of HIV medication    =          $1000                          

4 copies of an intro to chemistry textbook =    $1000   

 

a. Present the exchange value for 1 pair of Christian Louboutin shoes in the form that Marx calls “the expanded form” or “the total form.”

 

b. Present the exchange-value of one bottle of Grey Goose Vodka in “the simple form” in relation to dose(s) of HIV medication.

 

c. Imagine you go to Macy’s to buy a shirt.  Which form of exchange-value will Macy’s present to you?

 

d. In the example above, one dose of the HIV medication and 200 bottles of the Grey Goose Vodka cost the same amount ($5000).  Discuss the use-values of each.  Are their use-values also equal? 

 

e. On Marx’s analysis, what is the common element of (or the common element “congealed in”) one dose of the HIV medication and 200 bottles of the vodka, which is the basis of their having the same (or equal) price?

 

f. On page 129, Marx argues that it is a conceptual mistake—and a misunderstanding of his argument—to think that the more hours of labor it takes to produce a given item, the greater the magnitude of exchange-value (or the price) will be.  What precisely is it then that determines the magnitude of exchange-value or price of a commodity, if it is not labor time?

 

g.  Prepare notes on the following question, so you are prepared to discuss it, but do not write this one up: As you re-read the Marx assignment, notice that Marx in some cases speaks of “value” without specifying “use-” or “exchange-”.  What does he mean by “value” in these cases?

 

Question 3

a. The last sentence on p. 297 begins, “The value advanced has not been valorized…”  Provide a precise definition or glossary entry for “valorized,” as it used here?

b. Provide a precise definition or glossary entry for “surplus value,” as Marx uses the term.

c. Compare the first hypothetical scenario of production, which ends with “the value of the product” being “equal to the capital advanced,” to the second hypothetical scenario that follows and ends very differently: “…the value of the product is thus one-ninth greater than the value advanced to produce it; 27 shillings have turned into 30 shillings; a surplus-value of 3 shillings has been precipitated. The trick has at last worked…” (301).   What difference between the two hypothetical scenarios accounts for, or explains, the dramatically different outcomes?  (NOTE: the argument here is arguably the very core of Marx’s critique of capitalism.)

 

Question 4 Prepare notes on the following question, so you are prepared to discuss it, but do not write this one up:  Marx uses humor throughout Capital.  Really, he does.  Identify one passage in the reading where you think the use of humor is important.  Be prepared to quote that passage and explain the humor and what Marx is doing with it.

 

Question 5: pick one of the following two questions about the film to address in writing and prepare notes for yourself about the other one, so you can discuss it in class.

 

Option A:  Recount and explain what occurs in the opening scene of the film.  Discuss its significance for the film as a whole.

   

Option B:   Identify and discuss any ideas presented in the film that correspond to, or connect closely with, ideas in the assigned Marx reading.