Study Guide Questions on Marx Reading

 

1a. What does Marx mean by the “use-value" of a commodity?  Provide a concise and precise definition of the term, in Marx's sense of it.

1b. Marx holds that every commodity has a use-value (that is, he argues that if something lacks a use-value, it cannot and will not be a commodity).  What, however, does Marx say about whether the the use-value of a given commodity is singular?  Can a given commodity have more than one use-value or just one and no more?  Your answer should clearly identify Marx's position on this question and provide a brief explanation of it.  What is the reason, in Marx, for use-value of a commodity either being singular (if that is what he claims) or not (if that is what he claims).

1c.  Provide an example that illustrates your answer to 1b.  In other words, pick an example of a commodity that illustrates the claim Marx makes about whether the use-value of a given commodity is singular or plural.

1d & 1e.  In speaking of the various “human needs” that are met (in capitalist societies) by “commodities,” Marx writes that these can be “needs” either of “the stomach” or of “the imagination” (p. 125).  What do you think Marx means by ‘needs of the stomach’?  What do you think Marx means by ‘needs of the imagination’?  Unpack each of these figures of speech, as used here by Marx. 

1f. According to Marx, can a good or service be useful, and thus have a significant use-value (or significant use-values), and yet not be a commodity?  Explain.  And if your answer is ‘yes,’ illustrate your answer with an example of something, in a capitalist society, that has significant use-value and yet is not a commodity.

 

2. The following purely hypothetical statement of “exchange-values” is in what Marx calls “the general form of value” (p. 157) and, more specifically, it is in “the money-form of value”:

            1 Versace sweater                                                         }

            1/100th  of a Civic Hybrid automobile                            }

            10 bottles of AbsolutÔ vodka                                       }  == $250

            1/10th  of one dose of HIV medication                          }

            1 Set of Textbooks for Intro to Chemistry at the 5 Cs    }

As indicated on page 157 of the reading, the above should be read as stating that all of the items on the left equal or cost $250.  Starting with this (hypothetical) set of exchange-values, answer the following questions:

 

a. Working from the above statement of exchange-values, create the equivalent statement of exchange-values for the Versace sweater, giving this in what Marx calls “the expanded form of value.”

b. Working from the same statement of exchange-values, create what Marx calls “the simple form of value” for the Versace sweater in relation to the HIV medication.

c.  Working from the same statement of exchange values, create what Marx calls “the simple form of value” for the Absolut Vodka in terms of the Textbooks for Intro to Chemistry.

 

3. Working once again with the exchange-values given in question 2, we find that both 1 bottle of Absolut vodka and 1/100th of one dose of HIV medication both equal (or both "cost") $25.  Keeping this result in mind, answer the following questions:

a. Briefly describe the use value(s) of Absolut vodka and HIV medication (in the ordinary way or ways these commodities are consumed in the social world around you).

b. What, if anything, is the overlap in their respective use-values?  What do their use-value(s) have in common?

c. As we have already noted, in this example the exchange-value of one bottle of the Absolut vodka and the exchange value of 1/100th of one dose of HIV medication are "equal."  Are the use-values of the two commodities, as you have described them in 3a, "equal"?

d. On Marx’s analysis, what is the common element of (or congealed in) both the bottle of Absolut vodka and the 1/100th of one dose of HIV medication that is "equal" and thus the basis of their equal exchange-values?

 

4. This question does not refer to the table in question 2.  Marx argues that it is a conceptual mistake to hold that the greater the quantity of labor “expended to produce” a particular commodity, the greater its exchange value will be (see p. 129 and 303).  Thus, on Marx’s view it is not the sheer quantity of labor that determines the magnitude of exchange value. 

a. Given this, what term does Marx use for the factor that does, on his analysis, determine the magnitude of exchange-value?

b. Briefly explain what Marx means by this other term?

  

5a. On page 297-8, Marx concludes a sketch of a scenario in which a capitalist makes no profit; on page 303, he concludes a sketch of a scenario in which the same capitalist makes a profit.  Compare the two scenarios.  What is the difference that accounts for the different outcomes in the two scenarios?  Why is there no profit in one scenario and profit in the other one?

5b.  Define the phrase, “the valorization process,” as used by Marx.

6.  Find and quote any passage in the assigned reading in which you think Karl (not Groucho!) Marx was at least trying to be funny.  Explain the joke you have identified and tell us whether you were or were not genuinely amused by it and why.