History 82: Fall, 2001, Professor Judith V.
Grabiner
The history of science and technology in the 19th and
20th centuries
Office: Fletcher Hall 224, extension 7-3160;
email jgrabiner@pitzer.edu
Office Hours: MWF 10:30 – 11:30, Thursday 3-4,
and by appointment.
Every
reasonable effort will be made to accommodate students with disabilities. Pitzer students needing to request
accommodations or additional assistance may contact the Academic Support
Services Office, extension
7-3553.
Themes: What is characteristic of science in
the nineteenth and twentieth centuries?
Make your own list, but the course will address the biological
revolution and its implications for the study of human beings; the rise of statistical
thinking; modern physics, chemistry, philosophy, and the atomic bomb; the
influence of science on technology; and the interaction between science,
technology, and society.
Required Books (in
bookstore):
Appleman, Philip, ed., Darwin,
3d edition, Norton paperback, 2000.
Gould, Stephen J., The
Mismeasure of Man, revised edition, Norton paperback, 1996.
Koertge, Noretta, A House
Built on Sand, Oxford University paperback, 2000.
Mowrey, David C., and Nathan
Rosenberg, Paths of Innovation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
paperback, 1999.
Porter, Theodore, The
Rise of Statistical Thinking, 1820-1900, Princeton paperback, 1986.
Rhodes, Richard, The
Making of the Atomic Bomb, Touchstone paperback, 1995.
Watson, J. D., The Double
Helix, Touchstone paperback, 2001.
Strongly recommended
collateral reading (on reserve in Honnold):
Charles C. Gillispie, The Edge of Objectivity,
Princeton, 1960, pages 260-520.
This provides a continuous
narrative covering the period of the course. Reading this will help place specific topics in
context. Although this is an old
book, both chronologically and in its approach to the history of science, it
summarizes a lot of sound scholarship and hits many of the important
points.
Articles may be handed out
in class at any time, and many suggestions for additional reading will be
provided.
Course
policies: (Please read
these now!)
(1)
You are responsible for any assignments, handouts, revisions of calendar, etc.,
made or given in class. Please
check with me or with a classmate should you miss class.
(2)
Attending class, participating in discussions, courtesy to your classmates,
will be taken into account in borderline grade situations. Besides, these things will add to your
learning.
(3)
Late work will be penalized 10% for each day that it is late. [Exceptions for compelling reasons
(e.g., illness) must be
requested by the due date. Leave a
message on my machine, 7-3160, or on email, jgrabiner@pitzer.edu.]
(4)
Part of this class will be student-led discussions, with individuals or pairs
of students being responsible for a brief presentation and then a
discussion. These events will
follow completion of each major reading assignment.
(5)
There will be one exam: a final,
for which study questions will be provided. The final will count 30% of the grade. As long as this class remains small, it
will be run as a seminar: lots of
discussion, students giving occasional reports. This is more fun and results in more learning. People strongly desiring a midterm may
have one as an option; let me know.
Other
Assignments:
(1) For each individual
reading and for each class at which a reading is to be discussed, bring
in a sheet of paper with one sentence -- no more -- answering each of
these 3 questions:
(I) What is the main point of this? (or, if that
seems too difficult, “What is this about?” (II) What is an
important question the reading raises, or an important question that you have
about it?
(III) What did you personally find most interesting
about it?
This
is to be TYPED or in PRINTED VERY LEGIBLY in INK. Please do not e-mail it. Its purpose is partly to give you a start on the in-class
discussion, and partly for you and me to have a continuing dialogue about the
materials. Your grade on these
will be the percentage you have completed, except that if your questions do not
engage the material in a serious way you won’t get full credit.
(2) Short papers and reports may be
assigned in various points in the course as relevant. For instance, you may be asked to write a brief essay on
materials read, or to report on some outside reading.
(3) Each student will be required to
attend at least THREE out-of-class lectures or other events relating to the
subject of the course. (Not
straight science lectures, though.)
All the lectures of interest I know about will be announced in class;
these will include the Science, Technology, and Society colloquium lectures
which happen about once a month.
If you find a lecture I haven’t found, bring me a notice and I’ll
be delighted to announce it.
A
report, NO MORE THAN ONE double-spaced TYPED page in length, coherently and
accurately describing the main points, and concluding with your
judgment of the value of the lecture, will be required; this is due NO
LATER THAN the second class period following the event. PLEASE NOTE THE UNDERLINED
REQUIREMENTS! You’ll get
full credit if you meet these requirements, though I may make comments on your
writing – or engage your ideas -- for your benefit.
(4) Bring questions if you have them. For your own reading – of everything in the world, not
just material in this course -- in addition to the questions in #1 above, it is
useful to ask, “How does this author’s text relate to others
I’ve read?”, “What’s the evidence and is it sufficient
to support the author’s points?” and “Who’s s/he
shooting at?”
Dates to note:
2d day of Rosh Hashanah Wednesday September 19: Class will not meet
Fall Break Monday and
Tuesday, October 22-23: No class
Monday
Thanksgiving Thursday and
Friday November 22-23. Reading day
November 21
Final Examination: Monday, December 17, 2 PM
Calendar (subject to
adjustment as our intellectual adventures dictate; page numbers are tentative
and may be revised):
Wed., Sept. 5: Introduction to the course; Lecture on the background to
Darwin. (Readings for the
September 10 class, except the last which is in one of the required books, will
be made available)
Mon. Sept. 10: A series of challenges to shape the
course:
Is the history of science
just telling what happened when? (J R R Christie, “The Development of the
Historiography of Science”);
Is technology the hope for
all humanity? (C Alvares,
“Science, Colonialism, and Violence: A Luddite View”);
Is the choice of a
scientific career just a choice?
(H Etzkowitz et al., “Barriers to Women in Academic Science and
Engineering”);
What happens when the
content of science clashes with widespread public views – for instance,
religion? (National Academy of
Sciences, “Frequently Asked Questions about Evolution and the Nature of Science”
[1998], in P Appleman, ed., Darwin, pp. 617-623)
Wed.
Sept. 12: The biological
revolution begins: P. Appleman,
ed., Darwin, selections from The Origin of Species, 95-135 (make
sure you understand the diagram on page 128). Also read the selection from Malthus in Appleman, pp. 39-40.
Mon. Sept. 17: Darwin continued, Appleman
135-174. Essay to be
assigned: pick a sub-topic from
Appleman, read the relevant essays, explain what the issue is and what you
think about it (a more formal description will be provided)
No class Wednesday
Mon. Sept. 24: Darwin continued: Descent of Man, Appleman,
175-222, 252-254 (do not miss this last little bit!)
Wed. Sept. 26: Student reports on topic of Sept. 17
Mon. Oct. 1: A first-hand and very personal view of
a major scientific breakthrough:
J. D. Watson, The Double
Helix (all of Watson’s text)
Wed. Oct. 3: Students: what’s all this about a biological revolution? Readings from Science magazine,
issue of 16 February 2001 on the human genome, to be handed out: Svante Päabo, “The Human
Genome and Our View of Ourselves,” Peter McGuffin et al., “Toward
Behavioral Genomics,” Senators James Jeffords (R-Vermont) and Tom Daschle
(D-South Dakota), “Political Issues in the Genome Era,” and reviews
of three books:
R C Lewontin on Lily Kay, Who
Wrote the Book of Life? A History
of the Genetic Code; Sean B. Carroll on Evelyn Fox Keller, The Century
of the Gene; Sydney Brenner on Kevin Davies, Cracking the Genome: Inside the Race to Unlock Human DNA.
Mon. Oct. 8: Biology, psychology, race: S J Gould, Mismeasure of Man.
Two introductions:
Where’s Gould coming
from? Gould, 19-61. What does he
conclude? Gould, 351-366.
Wed. Oct. 10: Gould in action: on Broca: 105-141.
Mon. Oct. 15: Gould
continued: IQ, Gould 176-263.
Wed. Oct. 17: Students: social issues and science. Readings will be chosen by individuals by topic, ranging
from Rosalind Franklin’s role in DNA to Herrnstein and Murray’s
book The Bell Curve.
No class Monday, Oct. 22
Wed. Oct. 24: Theodore Porter, Rise of Statistical
Thinking. Pages 1-13, chapter
2 (pp 40-70), chapter 4 (pp 93-109).
This is about the origin of statistics in the study of society.
Mon. Oct. 29:
Statistical thinking continued.
Chapter 5 (pp 110-148),
selections from chapter 6 (pp 151, 162-176). These are about the relationship between physics and social
science, and about free will and determinism.
Wed. Oct. 31: Students: various topics
Mon. Nov. 5: Richard Rhodes, The Atomic Bomb
(the book addresses many topics in the history of chemistry and physics as well
as the topic of the title).
Chapters 2, 7. Among many
other topics, these chapters will introduce atomic physics and relativity.
Over this two weeks, rapidly
skim through EVERY unassigned chapter.
Wed. Nov. 7: Rhodes continued. Chapters 10, 14. These introduce us to the physics of
nuclear reactions and the establishment of the Manhattan project.
Mon. Nov. 12: Rhodes continued. Chapters 17, 18. These introduce the moral, social, and
political questions facing scientists whose work has life-and-death
implications.
Wed.
Nov. 14: Rhodes, Chapters 19 &
Epilogue. The bombing of Japan and
its implications.
Mon. Nov. 19: Students: report on a topic from Rhodes
Wed. Nov. 21: Reading day
Mon. Nov. 26: The current
debate over science as a social phenomenon: Noretta Koertge, ed., A House Built on Sand. The Sokal Affair. Read Koertge’s introduction, 3-6;
Sokal, 9-22, Kitcher, 32-54.
Wed. Nov. 28: Koertge continued. Read Meera Nanda, “The Epistemic
Charity of the Social Constructivist Critics of Science and Why the Third World
Should Refuse the Offer,” and recall the earlier essay by Alvares. Also read and report on one additional
essay in this book, choosing a topic from Parts II, III, or IV.
Mon. Dec. 3: Science and technology in the
twentieth-century U. S. D Mowrey
and C Rosenberg, Paths of Innovation. Assigned reading:
Introduction, chapters 3 and 4, Conclusion, and a chapter of your
choice. For Monday, read 1-10, 47-70. A written essay assignment will follow.
Wed. Dec. 5: Mowrey and Rosenberg continued. Read 71-102, 167-180.
Mon. Dec. 10: Guest lecture: Professor Rudi Volti. No new reading.
Wed. Dec. 12: Bringing it all together.
Final Examination, Monday,
December 17, 2 P.M.